A bit of googling got me this from HuffPo:

Here in the U.S. those seeking a religious society want the government:

1. in the examining room with doctor and patient to tell a woman what to do with her body, and put both doctor and patient in jail if fail to conform to religious teachings;
2. in our bedrooms to enforce anti-sodomy laws;
3. in our classrooms to teach religious doctrine about evolution;
4. in our universities to prevent research on stem cells (now battling at the state level); and
5. to display religious doctrine in public places and courtrooms

We’re in a Judaeo–Christian world because our culture is soaking in it. Read a book, watch a movie, go to a gallery, listen to music and many cultural references are from this tradition. Many people in your country belong to the Judaeo–Christian tradition and they’ll be astonished to hear that you claim their country is not Christian.

What constitutes a “Jude0-Christian” way of life? Jews and Christians are two distinct religious communities (with many variances within each; we do not share a single way of living).

You say much of my country is still “steeped in this way of life.” And yet when I look around, I see poverty, I see people who would rather watch Flavor Flav than read a Gospel, I see MTV defining culture much more than any faith is. No prayer at football games and the like. In many towns, no Christmas displays. Some Churches are getting in legal trouble for ringing their bells. If there is a Christian heritage, I do not see it on the public square.

To parts of the rest of the world (secularized Europe in particular), America may look frighteningly religious. But we are most certainly in a post-Christian state. How exactly are these unnamed “religious groups” “pushing” their views on everyone else? Last I checked, you cannot make someone follow Jesus.

You’re not in a post-Christian country because much of your society is still steeped in the Judaeo–Christian way of life. And many religious groups use their political clout to push their views on everyone else, even those countries that receive funding from America.

@joy-Mari, why aren’t we in a post-Christian setting in contemporary America? and yes, I agreed that using sin is off-putting, but not as much as the way we use ‘God’ without thinking.

@Amanda: I like yer reasoning

Yes, the use of ‘sins’ is stupid, but theological language is misappropriated all across the cultural board. Welcome to a post-Christian America. People who are, for all intents and purposes, atheists will still routinely exclaim, “oh my God!” or “God d***!” No surprise that ‘sins’ would be misappropriated, particularly in this case. White guys, fat people, and racists are the last groups it is socially acceptable to loathe.